It's official: Dumb users spread viruses

It's true. Dumb users spread computer viruses. I read it at Silicon.com.

Here's the whole article:

'Dumb' users spread viruses - official
February 06 2004
by Ron Coates

Don't worry about the hackers - it's your friends…

Complacent and 'too-busy' users are responsible for the rapid spread of viruses, according to a study released Friday.

The 'nothing to do with me' mob are the major offenders, making up 90 per cent of the 1,000 UK employees surveyed. This vast majority believe that they have no part to play in preventing the spread of viruses, and that it is the responsibility of the IT department, Microsoft or the government.

Steve Brown, UK MD of network and security outfit Novell - which sponsored the report - said: "Viruses only work if there are people dumb enough to open them and pass them on."

But that's OK - almost two thirds (60 per cent) aren't aware of even the most basic virus-protection methods and one third claims to be too busy to bother - even if they knew how.

As an email recipient, being 100 per cent sure of the identity of an emailer isn't much protection - 58 per cent of your friends and colleagues will forward you spam without a thought, according to the survey.

More than half of those (over a third of the total) will already have verified their company, or their own, email address, by responding to spam.

And phishing is an concept unknown to the vast majority, though this may not matter too much to more than half of them - they can't even remember their password. Many of the rest can't wait to give it to all the world - one third write their passwords down and one in ten put it on a Post-It note on their desk.

Brown said: "We didn't know what to expect when we commissioned the survey. What surprised me was the lackadaisical attitude - most of them said that they would 'not be particularly bothered' by an attack, and only five per cent would feel bad if they helped spread it."

And he was concerned that the old chestnuts of multiple passwords and difficulties in distributing patches and updates were still a major problem. He said that education and training would gradually help to alleviate the problem, given the use of adequate systems.

Share this Page:




Share this page with family and friends…even complete strangers. It's up to you. Whatever floats your boat.

Click the icon below to select the method of sharing.



Read Comments (1)

Jonathan commented at 5:12 PM on February 9, 2004:

Sure, most people are dumb, but would any office building NOT have a security system in place, because only smart people worked there?

Let's face it, Windows is insecure. Blame hackers, blame users, blame the government, or whomever, but when the doors are unlocked, and the keys are in the ignition, you only have yourself to blame when someone steals your car when you walk away.

Windows is insecure. Period.

I like the "installed base" argument. "Windows suffers from the most viruses, because having a 95% installed base, it is a great target for hackers." Bullcrap. That's like saying because there are 6 billion people on Earth, organic viruses target us because we make such a great target.

The only reason we have pandemics is because we have a weakness in our immune system that a specific virus can target, not because people walk out into the rain without rainwear. Networks are the same way. Computer viruses target the weakness. A better immune system prevents both types of viruses.

Windows is insecure. Period.

Leave a comment

Please enter the letter "y" in the field below:


Browse the archives »